Difference between revisions of "Complications of crowdfunded architecture"
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== cost == | == cost == | ||
| − | + | When dealing with architecture its obviously not like financing a new book or design gadget. The money involved is in most cases excessively outranking other design fields. Making a realistic and understandable demand when starting a crowdfunding campaign is crucial for its success. Considering the high building costs, it seems viable to consider strategies to avoid | |
| − | + | ||
=== main problems === | === main problems === | ||
| − | - | + | - The cost of architecture projects is in comparison excessively high. <br> |
| − | - additional costs may occur. who is paying them? | + | - additional costs may occur during the process. who is paying them? <br> |
| − | - more then 10.000 often an unrealistic amount | + | - more then 10.000 often seems to be an unrealistic amount.<br> |
| − | === | + | === theoretical solutions === |
| − | - crowdfunding step by step / research. | + | - crowdfunding step by step / research.<br> |
| − | - crowdsourcing instead of funding | + | - crowdsourcing instead of funding<br> |
| − | - combining crowdfunding with other approaches | + | - combining crowdfunding with other approaches<br> |
| − | + | - financing the growth instead of the initial project<br> | |
| − | - financing the growth instead of the initial project | + | |
=== examples === | === examples === | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''+pool''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | +pool is a great example on how to deal with a major financial expense in terms of crowdfunding.<br> | ||
| + | The estimated project budget is 15$ million. This number not only scares people away, it is also very unlikely to be achieved. Especially considering the [[reach]] that architecture projects normally generate. | ||
| + | So +pools solution involved a strategy of funding the project step by step while raising awarenesss and attracting other funds and supporters.<br> | ||
| + | The initial kickstarting campaign therefore tries to generate 250.000$ for research instead of the whole 15$. This is still a lot, but considering the public accessibility and the fact that new york harbors a world wide attraction it is realistic and met his goals. | ||
| + | |||
| + | https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/694835844/pool-tile-by-tile | ||
| + | |||
== treshold == | == treshold == | ||
| Line 38: | Line 46: | ||
=== main problems === | === main problems === | ||
| − | - Exklusiver | + | - Exklusiver<br> |
| − | - Bedarf limitiert > nur ein Produkt statt tausende. | + | - Bedarf limitiert > nur ein Produkt statt tausende.<br> |
| − | - Entweder - oder Prinzip | + | - Entweder - oder Prinzip<br> |
| − | - Zeitliche Abfolge | + | - Zeitliche Abfolge<br> |
| − | === | + | === theoretical solutions === |
| − | - Umfassender research | + | - Umfassender research<br> |
| − | - Nischen nutzen | + | - Nischen nutzen<br> |
| − | - Urbane Experimente initiieren | + | - Urbane Experimente initiieren<br> |
=== examples === | === examples === | ||
| Line 58: | Line 66: | ||
=== main problems === | === main problems === | ||
| − | - Einzugsgebiet von Architektur Projekten eher Lokal | + | - Einzugsgebiet von Architektur Projekten eher Lokal<br> |
| − | - Nur in Ausnahmefällen funding durch aussenstehende (zB. Tourismus). | + | - Nur in Ausnahmefällen funding durch aussenstehende (zB. Tourismus).<br> |
| − | - Größere crowd > weniger geld / person | + | - Größere crowd > weniger geld / person<br> |
=== potential solutions === | === potential solutions === | ||
| − | - Kampagne im ersten Schritt bewusst Lokal auslegen. | + | - Kampagne im ersten Schritt bewusst Lokal auslegen.<br> |
| − | - Klare definition des Wertes für Aussenstehende. Vermittlung! | + | - Klare definition des Wertes für Aussenstehende. Vermittlung!<br> |
| − | - Geographie realistisch ausloten | + | - Geographie realistisch ausloten<br> |
| − | - Netzwerk gründen. | + | - Netzwerk gründen.<br> |
| − | - Marke statt Gebäude > Identifikation > Wachstum | + | - Marke statt Gebäude > Identifikation > Wachstum<br> |
| − | - Produktion im Produkt > Mehrwert. | + | - Produktion im Produkt > Mehrwert.<br> |
| − | - Crowdsourcing statt funding. | + | - Crowdsourcing statt funding.<br> |
| Line 83: | Line 91: | ||
=== main problems === | === main problems === | ||
| − | - Finanziert heist nicht genehmigt! | + | - Finanziert heist nicht genehmigt!<br> |
| − | - Öffentliche/ Behördliche Interessen | + | - Öffentliche/ Behördliche Interessen<br> |
=== potential solutions === | === potential solutions === | ||
| − | - Aufklärung über Ablauf und nötige Genehmigungen. | + | - Aufklärung über Ablauf und nötige Genehmigungen.<br> |
| − | - Einbindung in festgelegten Prozess | + | - Einbindung in festgelegten Prozess<br> |
| − | - Nutzung definierter Netzwerke zur Überwindung der Hürden.(Macht) | + | - Nutzung definierter Netzwerke zur Überwindung der Hürden.(Macht)<br> |
| Line 104: | Line 112: | ||
=== main problems === | === main problems === | ||
| − | - Dauerhafte Verantwortung | + | - Dauerhafte Verantwortung<br> |
| − | - Nachnutzung? | + | - Nachnutzung?<br> |
| − | - Recycling? | + | - Recycling?<br> |
| − | - Wer trägt entstehende Kosten? | + | - Wer trägt entstehende Kosten?<br> |
| − | - Langfristiges Planen von zeitlichen Abläufen. | + | - Langfristiges Planen von zeitlichen Abläufen.<br> |
=== potential solutions === | === potential solutions === | ||
| − | - Nachnutzungen mit einplanen | + | - Nachnutzungen mit einplanen<br> |
| − | - Temporär und recyclebar bauen | + | - Temporär und recyclebar bauen<br> |
| − | - Management und Nutzung von Anfang an einkalkulieren. | + | - Management und Nutzung von Anfang an einkalkulieren.<br> |
=== examples === | === examples === | ||
Revision as of 14:05, 2 December 2014
As Crowdfunding appears in many different ways, catering various services and fields, certain non beneficial aspects appear. This is an article discussing those aspects for architectural content. What are the downsides and weaknesses when trying to crowdfund an architecture project? How could they be avoided? Starting with an theoretic approach and finishing with examples and case studies.
complications
A list of complications that make architectural projects special when it comes to crowdsourcing. why do these arise? blabla
cost
When dealing with architecture its obviously not like financing a new book or design gadget. The money involved is in most cases excessively outranking other design fields. Making a realistic and understandable demand when starting a crowdfunding campaign is crucial for its success. Considering the high building costs, it seems viable to consider strategies to avoid
main problems
- The cost of architecture projects is in comparison excessively high.
- additional costs may occur during the process. who is paying them?
- more then 10.000 often seems to be an unrealistic amount.
theoretical solutions
- crowdfunding step by step / research.
- crowdsourcing instead of funding
- combining crowdfunding with other approaches
- financing the growth instead of the initial project
examples
+pool
+pool is a great example on how to deal with a major financial expense in terms of crowdfunding.
The estimated project budget is 15$ million. This number not only scares people away, it is also very unlikely to be achieved. Especially considering the reach that architecture projects normally generate.
So +pools solution involved a strategy of funding the project step by step while raising awarenesss and attracting other funds and supporters.
The initial kickstarting campaign therefore tries to generate 250.000$ for research instead of the whole 15$. This is still a lot, but considering the public accessibility and the fact that new york harbors a world wide attraction it is realistic and met his goals.
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/694835844/pool-tile-by-tile
treshold
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
main problems
- Exklusiver
- Bedarf limitiert > nur ein Produkt statt tausende.
- Entweder - oder Prinzip
- Zeitliche Abfolge
theoretical solutions
- Umfassender research
- Nischen nutzen
- Urbane Experimente initiieren
examples
catchment
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
main problems
- Einzugsgebiet von Architektur Projekten eher Lokal
- Nur in Ausnahmefällen funding durch aussenstehende (zB. Tourismus).
- Größere crowd > weniger geld / person
potential solutions
- Kampagne im ersten Schritt bewusst Lokal auslegen.
- Klare definition des Wertes für Aussenstehende. Vermittlung!
- Geographie realistisch ausloten
- Netzwerk gründen.
- Marke statt Gebäude > Identifikation > Wachstum
- Produktion im Produkt > Mehrwert.
- Crowdsourcing statt funding.
examples
approval
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
main problems
- Finanziert heist nicht genehmigt!
- Öffentliche/ Behördliche Interessen
potential solutions
- Aufklärung über Ablauf und nötige Genehmigungen.
- Einbindung in festgelegten Prozess
- Nutzung definierter Netzwerke zur Überwindung der Hürden.(Macht)
examples
longlevity
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
main problems
- Dauerhafte Verantwortung
- Nachnutzung?
- Recycling?
- Wer trägt entstehende Kosten?
- Langfristiges Planen von zeitlichen Abläufen.
potential solutions
- Nachnutzungen mit einplanen
- Temporär und recyclebar bauen
- Management und Nutzung von Anfang an einkalkulieren.
